From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19000 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2006 17:54:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 18756 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2006 17:54:24 -0000 Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 17:54:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20061207175424.18755.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/26854] Inordinate compile times on large routines In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "dberlin at dberlin dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-12/txt/msg00620.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #19 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-07 17:54 ------- Subject: Re: Inordinate compile times on large routines > This is the branch that you installed your changes on, right Dan? yes > > I suppose I should try it on another architecture to see whether the problem > might be darwin-specific, or ppc-specific, or 64-bit specific, or ... > > Who knows? > We now spend basically no time in PTA, and about 800 seconds in remove_ssa_form. Sometime later on, we run out of memory and crash. (IE it's somewhere other than the PTA, alias analysis, or tree-ssa that we run out of memory). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26854