From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 437 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2006 06:33:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 327 invoked by uid 48); 9 Dec 2006 06:32:53 -0000 Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2006 06:33:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20061209063253.326.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/30099] missed value numbering optimization (conditional-based assertions) In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-12/txt/msg00759.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-09 06:32 ------- Basically what needs here is that if we get i == j, then we need to also add asserts (in VRP) for all the uses of i and j, which makes it an almost useless to do :). There might be another bug about this filed by me. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30099