From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6842 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2006 18:16:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 6813 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2006 18:16:06 -0000 Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 18:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20061219181606.6812.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c/30259] [4.1 branch] ICE on valid code In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-12/txt/msg01613.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2006-12-19 18:16 ------- Subject: Re: New: [4.1 branch] ICE on valid code On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, edmar at freescale dot com wrote: > ./include -fPIC -specs=ldblspecs -g -DHAVE_GTHR_DEFAULT -DIN_LIBGC What's in ldblspecs? If it's built by an unmodified t-ppccomm, and so -mlong-double-128 is being passed to cc1, that's never worked for E500 (v1 or v2) as it would result in a libgcc with undefined references to TFmode functions. I.e., building a functional libgcc for E500 has needed a modified t-ppccomm (to avoid passing -mlong-double-128) ever since 4.1, and will continue to do so until my long double support patch (now being tested for mainline) goes in. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30259