public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/30205]  New: RFE: g++ --unmangle
@ 2006-12-13 22:16 Dave at Yost dot com
  2006-12-14  2:55 ` [Bug c++/30205] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dave at Yost dot com @ 2006-12-13 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

g++ and gcj should take an --unmangle option (or some such).  The effect would
be to tell ld to deliver its undefined symbols error messages with names that
have been unmangled by the algorithm appropriate to the language used.

Actually, I think this should be the default, and you should have to do
--no-unmangle to get the existing behavior.

Or, deliver the symbols both ways, like this:

__ZN9trapNamer5parseER3rowIKcE\ttrapNamer::parse(row<char const>&)
__ZN10trapNamerJC1EP9trapNamer\ttrapNamerJ::trapNamerJ(trapNamer*)

with command-line options to show one, the other, or both forms.


-- 
           Summary: RFE: g++ --unmangle
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.1.2
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: Dave at Yost dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30205


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/30205] RFE: g++ --unmangle
  2006-12-13 22:16 [Bug c++/30205] New: RFE: g++ --unmangle Dave at Yost dot com
@ 2006-12-14  2:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-12-20  3:25 ` geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-12-30 18:54 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-12-14  2:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-12-14 02:54 -------
You should use -Wl,--demangle really.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30205


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/30205] RFE: g++ --unmangle
  2006-12-13 22:16 [Bug c++/30205] New: RFE: g++ --unmangle Dave at Yost dot com
  2006-12-14  2:55 ` [Bug c++/30205] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-12-20  3:25 ` geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-12-30 18:54 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-12-20  3:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-12-20 03:25 -------
collect2 already does this on platforms which don't use GNU ld.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30205


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/30205] RFE: g++ --unmangle
  2006-12-13 22:16 [Bug c++/30205] New: RFE: g++ --unmangle Dave at Yost dot com
  2006-12-14  2:55 ` [Bug c++/30205] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-12-20  3:25 ` geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-12-30 18:54 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-12-30 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-12-30 18:54 -------
As noted by pinskia, this really is a linker option as opposed
to front-end option.


-- 

gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2006-12-30 18:54:19
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30205


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/30205] RFE: g++ --unmangle
       [not found] <bug-30205-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2011-10-01 22:59 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2011-10-01 22:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30205

Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |
         Resolution|                            |INVALID

--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-10-01 22:58:39 UTC ---
So closing as invalid, right?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-10-01 22:59 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-12-13 22:16 [Bug c++/30205] New: RFE: g++ --unmangle Dave at Yost dot com
2006-12-14  2:55 ` [Bug c++/30205] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-12-20  3:25 ` geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-12-30 18:54 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
     [not found] <bug-30205-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-10-01 22:59 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).