From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20897 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2006 07:39:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 20832 invoked by uid 48); 22 Dec 2006 07:39:41 -0000 Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 07:39:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20061222073941.20831.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/30164] Gimplifier does not produce valid gimple for global_vectora = CONSTRUCTOR In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2006-12/txt/msg01760.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-22 07:39 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Actually there are three seperate issues: > 1) for my recent vector patch, it was a c-gimplifier issue with respect of not > setting GIMPLE_REG_P on the decls for the compount literals, this helps with > complex typed variables also. I posted a semi correct patch for this but it needs to be improved so I withdrew it but I am about to post a new patch. > 2) we don't record constant vector constructors as min invarient This was fixed via: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg01366.html > 3) we still don't gimplifier correctly for the below testcase with the > constructor. I am about to post a patch for this. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30164