public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/30303] [4.2/4.3 regression] ICE with invalid constructor definition
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 03:35:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061227033547.6426.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-30303-1771@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-12-27 03:35 -------
Mine for the new year:
Index: decl.c
===================================================================
--- decl.c      (revision 120211)
+++ decl.c      (working copy)
@@ -6216,7 +6219,10 @@
               XXX Isn't this done in start_function, too?  */
            revert_static_member_fn (decl);
          if (DECL_ARTIFICIAL (old_decl))
-           error ("definition of implicitly-declared %qD", old_decl);
+           {
+             error ("definition of implicitly-declared %qD", old_decl);
+             return error_mark_node;
+           }

          /* Since we've smashed OLD_DECL to its
             DECL_TEMPLATE_RESULT, we must do the same to DECL.  */


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |dot org                     |org
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|2006-12-26 22:22:23         |2006-12-27 03:35:47
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30303


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-12-27  3:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-26 13:28 [Bug c++/30303] New: " reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-12-26 13:29 ` [Bug c++/30303] " reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-12-26 22:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-12-27  3:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2006-12-27  3:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-02  2:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-19 20:59 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-25 13:07 ` dayas2003 at yahoo dot com
2007-05-14 21:30 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-20  3:50 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-08-20  6:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-09-23 23:02 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2007-09-25 23:54 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
2007-10-09 19:28 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-13 19:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-14 18:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-14 18:16 ` [Bug c++/30303] [4.2 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-03 17:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-01 17:02 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-13  7:32 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061227033547.6426.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).