From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14445 invoked by alias); 5 Jan 2007 17:39:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 14406 invoked by uid 48); 5 Jan 2007 17:39:37 -0000 Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 17:39:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070105173937.14405.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/25514] [4.0/4.1 regression] internal consistency failure In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00306.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #15 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-05 17:39 ------- Eric asked me to weigh in here. My only concern about a backport is Comment #9, which suggests that the patch didn't work. I'm assuming that since we're all talking about backporting it, that comment was mistaken? If indeed there are no known problems, I think it's reasonable to put this on 4.1. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25514