From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12915 invoked by alias); 5 Jan 2007 18:34:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 12868 invoked by uid 48); 5 Jan 2007 18:33:49 -0000 Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 18:34:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070105183349.12867.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/25514] [4.0/4.1 regression] internal consistency failure In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00312.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #18 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-05 18:33 ------- > Do you mean positive cascading effects, in that bugs go away, or > negative, in that new bugs show up? Positive cascading effects if the set of patch is backported to the branch. > Do you think that backporting this patch is going to fix some bugs at the > expense of breaking others? That will very likely fix again 28243 and help for 29329. I can make a quick pass on the various related PRs for mainline/4.2/4.1 over the week-end and post kind of an overview of the situation before you definitely decide. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25514