public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/19977] overflow in non-static initializer should not be pedwarn
       [not found] <bug-19977-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2006-12-09 14:28 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-12-10 17:18 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-12-09 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-12-09 14:28 -------
I believe that the culprit is a call to constant_expression_warning at
c-typeck.c (store_init_value). The comment just above this call says "ANSI
wants warnings about out-of-range constant initializers". However, if the
out-of-range constant initialiser is the result of an operation, a warning has
been emitted already by overflow_warning. If the out-of-range is the result of
a value that overflowed when converted to the type of the variable, a warning
should have been emitted by convert_and_check. 

So my question is, are we required to emit a special (pedantic) warning for: 

int c= INT_MAX + 1; 

different from the warning we already give for:

int c;
c = INT_MAX + 1;

?


-- 

manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
   Last reconfirmed|2005-12-18 01:39:36         |2006-12-09 14:28:13
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19977


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/19977] overflow in non-static initializer should not be pedwarn
       [not found] <bug-19977-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2006-12-09 14:28 ` [Bug c/19977] overflow in non-static initializer should not be pedwarn manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-12-10 17:18 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-12-15  1:15 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-12-10 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-12-10 17:17 -------
This patch seems to fix this. I get:

XPASS: gcc.dg/overflow-warn-3.c constant (test for bogus messages, line 42)
XPASS: gcc.dg/overflow-warn-4.c constant (test for bogus messages, line 42)

and no new failures on the overflow testcases.

I still have to properly bootstrap and regression test it. Any thoughts?

Index: gcc/c-typeck.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/c-typeck.c      (revision 119686)
+++ gcc/c-typeck.c      (working copy)
@@ -4358,7 +4360,7 @@ store_init_value (tree decl, tree init)

   /* ANSI wants warnings about out-of-range constant initializers.  */
   STRIP_TYPE_NOPS (value);
-  constant_expression_warning (value);
+  if (TREE_STATIC (decl)) constant_expression_warning (value);

   /* Check if we need to set array size from compound literal size.  */
   if (TREE_CODE (type) == ARRAY_TYPE


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19977


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/19977] overflow in non-static initializer should not be pedwarn
       [not found] <bug-19977-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2006-12-09 14:28 ` [Bug c/19977] overflow in non-static initializer should not be pedwarn manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-12-10 17:18 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-12-15  1:15 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
  2007-01-02 20:08 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-01-06  9:37 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: patchapp at dberlin dot org @ 2006-12-15  1:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from patchapp at dberlin dot org  2006-12-15 01:15 -------
Subject: Bug number PR c/19977

A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg01068.html


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19977


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/19977] overflow in non-static initializer should not be pedwarn
       [not found] <bug-19977-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-12-15  1:15 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
@ 2007-01-02 20:08 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-01-06  9:37 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-01-02 20:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #5 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-01-02 20:07 -------
Subject: Bug 19977

Author: manu
Date: Tue Jan  2 20:07:44 2007
New Revision: 120355

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120355
Log:
2007-01-02  Manuel Lopez-Ibanez <manu@gcc.gnu.org>

        PR c/19977
        * c-typeck.c (store_init_value): Don't emit pedantic overflow
        warning for non-static initializers.

testsuite/
        * gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/overflow-warn-3.c: Remove XFAIL.
        * gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/overflow-warn-4.c: Remove XFAIL.

Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/c-typeck.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/overflow-warn-3.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/overflow-warn-4.c


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19977


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/19977] overflow in non-static initializer should not be pedwarn
       [not found] <bug-19977-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-01-02 20:08 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-01-06  9:37 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-01-06  9:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #6 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-01-06 09:36 -------
Fixed in mainline.


-- 

manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.3.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19977


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/19977] overflow in non-static initializer should not be pedwarn
  2005-02-15 22:31 [Bug c/19977] New: " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-02-16  3:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-02-16  3:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-02-15 21:20 -------
Confirmed.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
           Keywords|                            |rejects-valid
      Known to fail|                            |3.3.3 3.2.3 3.4.0 4.0.0
                   |                            |3.0.4 2.95.3
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2005-02-15 21:20:00
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19977


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-01-06  9:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-19977-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2006-12-09 14:28 ` [Bug c/19977] overflow in non-static initializer should not be pedwarn manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-12-10 17:18 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-12-15  1:15 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2007-01-02 20:08 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-06  9:37 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-15 22:31 [Bug c/19977] New: " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-02-16  3:29 ` [Bug c/19977] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).