From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4711 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2007 03:19:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 4681 invoked by uid 48); 9 Jan 2007 03:19:29 -0000 Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 03:19:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070109031929.4679.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/30399] testsuite failures in actual_array_constructor_2.f90 and actual_array_substr_2.f90 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00556.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #6 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-09 03:19 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Kaveh, > As the culprit for both patches, I'll take a look. I had no idea that there > was and 4.1 regressions associated with them. I'll come back to you. > Paul Paul - I wouldn't say you're a "culprit", all you did was supply the testcases. They've failed ever since you checked them in, so they very well may have failed before then, i.e. probably not a regression. Nevertheless, thank you for volunteering to take a look. Let me know if you need help testing or whatever. Thanks, --Kaveh -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30399