From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28353 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2007 18:42:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 28285 invoked by uid 48); 11 Jan 2007 18:42:12 -0000 Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:42:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070111184212.28284.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/19520] protected function pointer doesn't work right In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "thiago at kde dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00963.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #22 from thiago at kde dot org 2007-01-11 18:42 ------- Is there any update on this bug? According to http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-01/msg00401.html, a protected function symbol cannot be used in a R_386_GOTOFF. I don't claim to understand the full implications of the issue, but it seems that the ld decision means gcc must not emit that relocation. -- thiago at kde dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thiago at kde dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19520