From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19971 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2007 17:18:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 19916 invoked by uid 48); 16 Jan 2007 17:18:44 -0000 Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:18:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070116171844.19915.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c/30477] Integer Overflow detection code optimised away, -fwrapv broken In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg01297.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-16 17:18 ------- We do weight between cost and result which is a reason we keep branches in active maintainance for a long time. But we need to focus on where the majority of our users are, which is gcc 4.1 nowadays. We don't have ressources to maintain older releases for an infinite time. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30477