From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18572 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2007 18:00:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 18442 invoked by uid 48); 16 Jan 2007 18:00:20 -0000 Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 18:00:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070116180020.18441.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c/30477] Integer Overflow detection code optimised away, -fwrapv broken In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg01300.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-16 18:00 ------- (In reply to comment #12) > Reopening this bug because http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-12/msg00749.html > states that: > "For example, GCC itself assumes wrapv semantics internally," And those places are getting fixed. Again this specific bug was fixed in 4.0.0. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30477