From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30926 invoked by alias); 17 Jan 2007 17:03:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 30875 invoked by uid 48); 17 Jan 2007 17:02:57 -0000 Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:03:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070117170257.30874.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c/30475] assert(int+100 > int) optimized away In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "felix-gcc at fefe dot de" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg01370.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #17 from felix-gcc at fefe dot de 2007-01-17 17:02 ------- You misunderstand. We don't want you to say anything. We want to you make your "optimization" off by default, or remove it altogether. You could also try to convince us that there is any actual tangible performance gain, then you would at least have a leg to stand on. We would still laugh in your face because you broke security code in real world apps and refuse to fix it, though, but it would be a start. -- felix-gcc at fefe dot de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30475