From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22708 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2007 22:15:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 22485 invoked by uid 48); 22 Jan 2007 22:14:57 -0000 Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 22:15:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070122221457.22484.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/30549] compiler warning in resolve.c: possibly uninitialized use of name In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg01869.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-22 22:14 ------- Can you try after: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2007-01/msg00765.html ? >and later used without extra if(name) in: No, that means it is used possiable as null. You need to check inside pure_function to see if there is a way that the second argument does not get initialized. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30549