From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19752 invoked by alias); 25 Jan 2007 16:59:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 19564 invoked by uid 48); 25 Jan 2007 16:59:22 -0000 Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 16:59:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070125165922.19563.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug java/30588] gcj compiler large jars much slower In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "aph at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg02161.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #1 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-25 16:59 ------- I'm guessing this is either because of more aggressive alalysis or perhaps we're now compiling unit-at-a-time. In any case, I don't think "Java" is the correct component. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30588