* [Bug fortran/23060] %VAL construct not implemented
[not found] <bug-23060-11040@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-12-07 15:28 ` martinol at nrlssc dot navy dot mil
2006-09-28 7:58 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: martinol at nrlssc dot navy dot mil @ 2005-12-07 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from martinol at nrlssc dot navy dot mil 2005-12-07 15:28 -------
Since g77 supported this construct, should this not be a regression rather than
an enhancement.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23060
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/23060] %VAL construct not implemented
[not found] <bug-23060-11040@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-12-07 15:28 ` [Bug fortran/23060] %VAL construct not implemented martinol at nrlssc dot navy dot mil
@ 2006-09-28 7:58 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-12 12:43 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-09-28 7:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-28 07:58 -------
Changing this into a bug, since it was implemented in g77. It might be working
soon, since we will soon have ISO_C_BINDING val attribute, which does the same
thing, so adding the %val construct will probably be very easy.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Severity|enhancement |normal
GCC target triplet|i386-redhat-linux |
Last reconfirmed|2006-03-05 03:41:17 |2006-09-28 07:58:23
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23060
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/23060] %VAL construct not implemented
[not found] <bug-23060-11040@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-12-07 15:28 ` [Bug fortran/23060] %VAL construct not implemented martinol at nrlssc dot navy dot mil
2006-09-28 7:58 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-10-12 12:43 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-12 13:19 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-10-12 12:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |enhancement
Keywords|rejects-valid |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23060
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/23060] %VAL construct not implemented
[not found] <bug-23060-11040@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-10-12 12:43 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-10-12 13:19 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-11-03 14:12 ` [Bug fortran/23060] %VAL, %REF and %DESCR constructs " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-10-12 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-12 13:19 -------
[Paul changed this bug into enhancement]
I'm changing this back (again) into a bug, not an enhancement, because it was
supported by g77, and we're trying to make a drop-in replacement for g77 in
most cases.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|enhancement |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23060
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/23060] %VAL, %REF and %DESCR constructs not implemented
[not found] <bug-23060-11040@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2006-10-12 13:19 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-11-03 14:12 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-11-14 10:16 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-11-03 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-03 14:11 -------
Adding %REF and %DESCR to the summary. Documentation available here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.4.6/g77/Functions-and-Subroutines.html
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|2006-09-28 07:58:23 |2006-11-03 14:11:48
date| |
Summary|%VAL construct not |%VAL, %REF and %DESCR
|implemented |constructs not implemented
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23060
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/23060] %VAL, %REF and %DESCR constructs not implemented
[not found] <bug-23060-11040@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-11-03 14:12 ` [Bug fortran/23060] %VAL, %REF and %DESCR constructs " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-11-14 10:16 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-12-29 17:25 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-11-14 10:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 10:16 -------
A long overdue patch for this will be submitted in the next 24hours.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2006-11-03 14:11:48 |2006-11-14 10:16:44
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23060
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/23060] %VAL, %REF and %DESCR constructs not implemented
[not found] <bug-23060-11040@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2006-11-14 10:16 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-12-29 17:25 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2006-12-31 6:55 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: patchapp at dberlin dot org @ 2006-12-29 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-12-29 17:25 -------
Subject: Bug number PR23060
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg01834.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23060
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/23060] %VAL, %REF and %DESCR constructs not implemented
[not found] <bug-23060-11040@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2006-12-29 17:25 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
@ 2006-12-31 6:55 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-06 14:14 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-12-31 6:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-31 06:55 -------
Subject: Bug 23060
Author: pault
Date: Sun Dec 31 06:55:16 2006
New Revision: 120295
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120295
Log:
2006-12-31 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/23060
* intrinsic.c (compare_actual_formal ): Distinguish argument
list functions from keywords.
* intrinsic.c (sort_actual): If formal is NULL, the presence of
an argument list function actual is an error.
* trans-expr.c (conv_arglist_function) : New function to
implement argument list functions %VAL, %REF and %LOC.
(gfc_conv_function_call): Call it.
* resolve.c (resolve_actual_arglist): Add arg ptype and check
argument list functions.
(resolve_function, resolve_call): Set value of ptype before
calls to resolve_actual_arglist.
* primary.c (match_arg_list_function): New function.
(gfc_match_actual_arglist): Call it before trying for a
keyword argument.
2006-12-31 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/23060
* gfortran.dg/c_by_val.c: Called by c_by_val_1.f.
* gfortran.dg/c_by_val_1.f: New test.
* gfortran.dg/c_by_val_2.f: New test.
* gfortran.dg/c_by_val_3.f: New test.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/c_by_val.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/c_by_val_1.f
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/c_by_val_2.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/c_by_val_3.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/char_length_1.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/interface.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/primary.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23060
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/23060] %VAL, %REF and %DESCR constructs not implemented
[not found] <bug-23060-11040@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2006-12-31 6:55 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-01-06 14:14 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-06 14:18 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-01-06 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-06 14:13 -------
Subject: Bug 23060
Author: pault
Date: Sat Jan 6 14:13:20 2007
New Revision: 120525
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120525
Log:
2007-01-06 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
Bug fixes from trunk
PR fortran/30034
* resolve.c (resolve_formal_arglist): Exclude the test for
pointers and procedures for subroutine arguments as well as
functions.
PR fortran/30237
* intrinsic.c (remove_nullargs): Do not pass up arguments with
a label. If the actual has a label and the formal has a type
then emit an error.
PR fortran/25135
* module.c (load_generic_interfaces): If the symbol is present
and is not generic it is ambiguous.
PR fortran/23060
* intrinsic.c (compare_actual_formal ): Distinguish argument
list functions from keywords.
* intrinsic.c (sort_actual): If formal is NULL, the presence of
an argument list function actual is an error.
* trans-expr.c (conv_arglist_function) : New function to
implement argument list functions %VAL, %REF and %LOC.
(gfc_conv_function_call): Call it.
* resolve.c (resolve_actual_arglist): Add arg ptype and check
argument list functions.
(resolve_function, resolve_call): Set value of ptype before
calls to resolve_actual_arglist.
* primary.c (match_arg_list_function): New function.
(gfc_match_actual_arglist): Call it before trying for a
keyword argument.
PR fortran/27900
* resolve.c (resolve_actual_arglist): If all else fails and a
procedure actual argument has no type, see if a specific
intrinsic matches.
PR fortran/24325
* resolve.c (resolve_function): If the function reference is
FL_VARIABLE this is an error.
2007-01-06 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/30034
* gfortran.dg/pure_formal_proc_1.f90: New test.
PR fortran/30237
* gfortran.dg/intrinsic_actual_3.f90: New test.
PR fortran/25135
* gfortran.dg/generic_11.f90: New test.
* gfortran.dg/interface_7.f90: Remove name clash between module
name and procedure 'x' referenced in the interface.
PR fortran/23060
* gfortran.dg/c_by_val.c: Called by c_by_val_1.f.
* gfortran.dg/c_by_val_1.f: New test.
* gfortran.dg/c_by_val_2.f: New test.
* gfortran.dg/c_by_val_3.f: New test.
PR fortran/27900
* gfortran.dg/intrinsic_actual_4.f90: New test.
PR fortran/24325
* gfortran.dg/func_decl_3.f90: New test.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/c_by_val.c
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/c_by_val_1.f
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/c_by_val_2.f90
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/c_by_val_3.f90
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/func_decl_3.f90
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/generic_11.f90
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_actual_3.f90
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/intrinsic_actual_4.f90
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pure_formal_proc_1.f90
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/fortran/interface.c
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/fortran/module.c
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/fortran/primary.c
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/dummy_procedure_1.f90
branches/gcc-4_2-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/interface_7.f90
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23060
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/23060] %VAL, %REF and %DESCR constructs not implemented
[not found] <bug-23060-11040@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2007-01-06 14:14 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-01-06 14:18 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-10 19:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-01-06 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #15 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-06 14:17 -------
Fixed on trunk and 4.2
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23060
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/23060] %VAL, %REF and %DESCR constructs not implemented
[not found] <bug-23060-11040@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2007-01-06 14:18 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-01-10 19:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-26 1:05 ` dmarkman at mac dot com
2007-01-26 1:45 ` dmarkman at mac dot com
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-01-10 19:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23060
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/23060] %VAL, %REF and %DESCR constructs not implemented
[not found] <bug-23060-11040@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2007-01-10 19:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-01-26 1:05 ` dmarkman at mac dot com
2007-01-26 1:45 ` dmarkman at mac dot com
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: dmarkman at mac dot com @ 2007-01-26 1:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #16 from dmarkman at mac dot com 2007-01-26 01:05 -------
it looks like that suggested code doesn't work for x86_64 platform. I changed
ADDR declaration to
INTEGER *8 and gfortran -m64 percentval.f returns the following errors:
CALL SUB1( %VAL( ADDR ), SIZE )
1
Error: Kind of by-value argument at (1) is larger than default kind
I did it on Mac OS X 10.4.8 and with gcc 4.2
but I guess it could work on Leopard 10.5 but I didn't check it
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23060
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/23060] %VAL, %REF and %DESCR constructs not implemented
[not found] <bug-23060-11040@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2007-01-26 1:05 ` dmarkman at mac dot com
@ 2007-01-26 1:45 ` dmarkman at mac dot com
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: dmarkman at mac dot com @ 2007-01-26 1:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #17 from dmarkman at mac dot com 2007-01-26 01:45 -------
after looking at the gcc/fortran/trans_types.c I tried to use
-fdefault-integer-8 switch
and everything was fine
--
dmarkman at mac dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dmarkman at mac dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23060
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread