From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11916 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2007 20:15:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 11845 invoked by uid 48); 28 Jan 2007 20:15:45 -0000 Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:15:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070128201545.11844.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/22456] [4.1/4.2/4.3 regression] missing "is used uninitialized" warning In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "muntyan at tamu dot edu" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg02456.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #8 from muntyan at tamu dot edu 2007-01-28 20:15 ------- Is the code here or in comment #2 the same as in 30542 and 30575? It may be, but gcc users who don't know gcc internals (like me), can't easily see this, and missing warning (in those two bugs, not here) is quite a serious regression, which means one can expect more warnings to disappear. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22456