From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25680 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2007 22:57:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 25643 invoked by uid 48); 28 Jan 2007 22:57:40 -0000 Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 22:57:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070128225740.25642.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/30564] [4.3 Regression] ice for legal code with -O3 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg02464.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-28 22:57 ------- (In reply to comment #11) > SRA messes up somehow and it only happens with inlined functions so I am going > to look more into it. I have a fix for the SRA issue now, SRA tries to look into 3rd/4th operand to decide if the array is a non constant stride but in_array_bounds_p already checks that so there is no need to check the 3rd/4th operand again. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30564