public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug java/12981] Binary compatibility: low-level API exposure
       [not found] <bug-12981-360@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2007-01-30 20:11 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-01-30 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-01-30 20:11 -------
I believe we decided not to worry about this.
We can always introduce new names for low-level functions as needed.


-- 

tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.3.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12981


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug java/12981] Binary compatibility: low-level API exposure
  2003-11-10  0:25 [Bug java/12981] New: " tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-11-10  2:35 ` [Bug java/12981] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-05-11 17:26 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-05-11 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-05-10 18:51 -------
The current thinking is to still emit direct calls.
Perhaps we should version the symbols in case we need
to change things around in the future.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12981


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [Bug java/12981] Binary compatibility: low-level API exposure
  2003-11-10  0:25 [Bug java/12981] New: " tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-11-10  2:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-05-11 17:26 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-11-10  2:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2003-11-10 02:35:54
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12981


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-01-30 20:11 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-12981-360@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2007-01-30 20:11 ` [Bug java/12981] Binary compatibility: low-level API exposure tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-10  0:25 [Bug java/12981] New: " tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-10  2:35 ` [Bug java/12981] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-11 17:26 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).