From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12156 invoked by alias); 31 Jan 2007 02:04:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 10269 invoked by uid 48); 31 Jan 2007 02:03:47 -0000 Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 02:04:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070131020347.10267.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug testsuite/25241] DejaGNU does not distinguish between errors and warnings In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "janis at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg02696.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #8 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-31 02:03 ------- This is nice, Manuel, I hadn't considered changing the expressions as they are added to the messages list. Another possibility is to add two new test directives, for example dg-gcc-warning and dg-gcc-error, and leave dg-warning and dg-error as they are. This has the advantage of not confusing people who are accustomed to the existing behavior of the DejaGnu versions of these procs. That way you could start using the new ones immediately, and we can gradually move other tests to use them as well. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25241