public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/25241] DejaGNU does not distinguish between errors and warnings
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 22:24:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070131222346.24520.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-25241-1000@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
------- Comment #16 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-31 22:23 -------
Created an attachment (id=12991)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12991&action=view)
version 2
This is a new version of the patch. It fixes some issues with the previous one
that made correct testcases to fail (92 in total). I think "concat" was not
appropriate, perhaps it was something else...
I still have to investigate the ones that fail with this patch to check that
none of them are spurious failures caused by some other error in my patch.
Also, I removed ":" from the patterns as a workaround to be able to match "cc1:
warnings being treated as errors". Still, the message has to be modified to be
"being treated as errors", so those testcases still fail with the current
patch.
Testsuite framework tests pass with this patch.
Around 539 files show failing testcases because of this patch. I can provide
the full list if some is interested.
Suggestions are welcome.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25241
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-31 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-03 10:12 [Bug testsuite/25241] New: " gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-12-03 16:39 ` [Bug testsuite/25241] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-11-27 22:12 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-27 16:49 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-30 20:36 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-30 21:02 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2007-01-30 21:10 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-30 22:14 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2007-01-31 2:04 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-31 2:28 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-31 6:44 ` gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu
2007-01-31 17:34 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-31 18:11 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-31 18:34 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-31 19:11 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2007-01-31 21:15 ` gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu
2007-01-31 22:24 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2007-02-02 12:17 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-02 13:14 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-03 1:29 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-03 22:58 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-28 0:31 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-28 9:57 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-01 21:36 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-01 22:54 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-01 23:25 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-13 0:29 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-13 0:34 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-13 0:44 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-13 0:49 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-22 22:37 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-23 20:51 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-23 21:15 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-23 21:52 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-23 22:00 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-23 22:06 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-23 22:13 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-23 22:49 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-23 23:52 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-24 0:28 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-24 11:10 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-24 17:55 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-26 19:49 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-29 0:12 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-30 11:25 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-30 20:14 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-05-15 0:35 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-05-15 15:16 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-05-15 18:30 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-05-17 1:52 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-04 21:12 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-05 22:30 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-06 20:49 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-07 21:02 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-30 13:03 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-30 13:07 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-08 14:50 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-10 9:17 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-12 22:58 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-12 23:05 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-08-22 20:10 ` [Bug testsuite/25241] [C++] " janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-08-26 18:30 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-17 0:09 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-17 23:25 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-18 22:32 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-28 22:19 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-06 17:51 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-10 22:37 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070131222346.24520.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).