From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2962 invoked by alias); 2 Feb 2007 16:06:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 2911 invoked by uid 48); 2 Feb 2007 16:06:26 -0000 Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 16:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070202160626.2910.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/30370] [4.1 regression] Build failure in libgcc2 powitf2 with ICE in gen_reg_rtx In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "dje at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-02/txt/msg00160.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #11 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-02 16:06 ------- I do not have a problem with the patch in principle. However, prior to the recent merge of the long-double-128 soft float support, one of the earlier patches caused GCC to fail to build on GNU/Linux distros without long-double-128 support in Glibc, such as SLES 9. I would want to know that this patch does not cause regressions on GNU/Linux before feeling completely comfortable about the patch. -- dje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-02-02 16:06:26 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30370