public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/29487] Shared libstdc++ fails to link
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 11:17:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070206111735.31995.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-29487-276@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #36 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-02-06 11:17 -------
(In reply to comment #34)
> I'll prepare a patch to revert my 2004 change too.

I suspect that a 100% literal reversion will run into problems where the
use of a global variable will result in the the analysis of one function
being applied to another function.

It will probably work (modulo minor merge conflicts) if instead of
bringing the global variable current_function_nothrow back, you define
a nothrow bit in struct function and
#define current_function_nothrow cfun->nothrow
.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29487


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-02-06 11:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-16 22:43 [Bug target/29487] New: " danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-16 23:11 ` [Bug target/29487] " danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-19  1:04 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-11-13  2:25 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-11-13  2:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-11-13  3:09 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2006-11-19 21:55 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2006-12-04  1:29 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2007-02-03  1:54 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-03  2:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-03  2:47 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2007-02-03  2:50 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2007-02-04 22:53 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
2007-02-05  0:15 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2007-02-05  3:06 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
2007-02-05  4:02 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2007-02-05  5:40 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
2007-02-05  9:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-05  9:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-05  9:22 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2007-02-05 18:34 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-05 19:26 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-05 19:33 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
2007-02-05 19:36 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-05 19:52 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-05 20:08 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
2007-02-06  8:27 ` paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch
2007-02-06  8:37 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2007-02-06  9:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-06 10:18 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-06 10:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-06 10:42 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2007-02-06 11:10 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-06 11:17 ` amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2007-02-06 14:13 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2007-02-06 21:18 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2007-02-09  2:53 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-10  1:02 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-10  1:13 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-11 18:58 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-11 19:20 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070206111735.31995.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).