From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3850 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 2007 10:05:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 3359 invoked by uid 48); 9 Feb 2007 10:05:39 -0000 Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 10:05:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070209100539.3358.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libfortran/30498] Support traceback (backtrace) on errors In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-02/txt/msg01003.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #9 from P dot Schaffnit at access dot rwth-aachen dot de 2007-02-09 10:05 ------- Hi! I had indeed thought about using soem variation on '0. / 0.', but I find it somewhat messy... Somehow generating a kill from C does looks like a viable alternative though (I would maybe not wait for the ISO C bindings and put that in an additional C routine). I nevertheless consider it only a second choice (though I could personally live with it!). Thanks a lot! Philippe -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30498