From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19564 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2007 06:56:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 19530 invoked by uid 48); 13 Feb 2007 06:56:21 -0000 Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 06:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070213065621.19529.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/29975] [meta-bugs] ICEs with CP2K In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pault at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-02/txt/msg01365.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #59 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-13 06:56 ------- (In reply to comment #58) > Subject: Re: [meta-bugs] ICEs with CP2K > > jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk wrote: > > ------- Comment #57 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-02-12 19:18 ------- > > > > > >> Yes, that's the one: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-02/msg00250.html > >> > >> > > > > for people reducing the bug, I found that it is in the module cp_fm_pool_types. > > This indicates the the line number indicated in the segfault would be wrong. > > Trying to reduce the testcase further, my automatic script got stuck on what is > > now PR 30779 > > > > > > > OK Yours is one and the same as Daniel's. The backtrace makes that > completely clear. The fix was posted to the list earlier on today. It > is just now regtesting - I will commit it before I go to bed tonight. > > Thanks for bearing with us. > > Paul > When you have a moment, could you confirm that all is now well with trunk, please? Once again, I am sorry about the breakage. Now I see Daniel's testcase, I realise that I could easily have devised a test... with 20:20 hindsight:) Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29975