From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24704 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2007 19:51:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 24482 invoked by uid 48); 13 Feb 2007 19:50:50 -0000 Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 19:51:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070213195050.24481.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/29975] [meta-bugs] ICEs with CP2K In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-02/txt/msg01408.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #62 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-13 19:50 ------- (In reply to comment #48) > Currently, there is a new ICE on CP2K (see initial comment) that happens at any > optimisation level: > > > gfortran -c all_cp2k_gfortran.f90 > all_cp2k_gfortran.f90:118549: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault > Please submit a full bug report, > with preprocessed source if appropriate. > See for instructions. > > this is a new regression. I really think CP2K should be added to some nightly > tester somewhere by gfortran developers... Well, I'd add it to my testsuite if weren't a PITA to figure out how to make it build. troutmask:sgk[246] tools/get_arch_code ########################################################### have a look at cp2k/tools/get_arch_code your system is a FreeBSD-FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #1: Fri Feb 9 12:01:52 PST 2007 root@troutmask.apl.washington.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SPEW -7.0-CURRENT-amd64 but get_arch_code is not able to deal with that ############################################################ unknown -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29975