* [Bug c/23104] [4.1 Regression] C does not reject the same function in two different TUs with -combine
[not found] <bug-23104-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-10-12 0:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-20 23:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-12 0:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-12 00:56 -------
Hmm, the 4.0 patch was approved, I wonder if I could get away with applying
this as obvious as it just gets us the same code as the 4.0 branch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23104
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug c/23104] [4.1 Regression] C does not reject the same function in two different TUs with -combine
[not found] <bug-23104-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-12 0:56 ` [Bug c/23104] [4.1 Regression] C does not reject the same function in two different TUs with -combine pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-20 23:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-31 4:18 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-20 23:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-20 23:51 -------
*** Bug 24446 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rep dot nop at aon dot at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23104
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug c/23104] [4.1 Regression] C does not reject the same function in two different TUs with -combine
[not found] <bug-23104-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-12 0:56 ` [Bug c/23104] [4.1 Regression] C does not reject the same function in two different TUs with -combine pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-20 23:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-31 4:18 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-31 4:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-31 4:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 04:18 -------
Downgraded to P4. If we can fix this great; otherwise, we'll look at it again
for 4.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P2 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23104
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug c/23104] [4.1 Regression] C does not reject the same function in two different TUs with -combine
[not found] <bug-23104-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-31 4:18 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-31 4:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-28 20:36 ` [Bug c/23104] [4.1/4.2 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-31 4:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-31 04:19 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> Downgraded to P4. If we can fix this great; otherwise, we'll look at it
> again for 4.2.
It is not like I did not post a patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23104
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug c/23104] [4.1/4.2 Regression] C does not reject the same function in two different TUs with -combine
[not found] <bug-23104-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-31 4:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-28 20:36 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-05-25 2:43 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-28 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.1.0 |4.1.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23104
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug c/23104] [4.1/4.2 Regression] C does not reject the same function in two different TUs with -combine
[not found] <bug-23104-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-28 20:36 ` [Bug c/23104] [4.1/4.2 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-05-25 2:43 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-14 9:24 ` [Bug c/23104] [4.1/4.2/4.3 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-05-25 2:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-25 02:35 -------
Will not be fixed in 4.1.1; adjust target milestone to 4.1.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.1.1 |4.1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23104
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug c/23104] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] C does not reject the same function in two different TUs with -combine
[not found] <bug-23104-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2006-05-25 2:43 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-02-14 9:24 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-18 20:06 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-02-14 9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.1.2 |4.1.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23104
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug c/23104] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] C does not reject the same function in two different TUs with -combine
[not found] <bug-23104-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2007-02-14 9:24 ` [Bug c/23104] [4.1/4.2/4.3 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-12-18 20:06 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-04 19:59 ` [Bug c/23104] [4.2/4.3/4.4 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-12-18 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-18 20:06 -------
As of today this is an ICE at least on Cygwin. cc1 segfaults during inlining.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23104
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug c/23104] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] C does not reject the same function in two different TUs with -combine
[not found] <bug-23104-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2007-12-18 20:06 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-04 19:59 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-14 17:10 ` nightstrike at gmail dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-04 19:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-04 19:58 -------
Closing 4.1 branch.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.1/4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression]|[4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] C
|C does not reject the same |does not reject the same
|function in two different |function in two different
|TUs with -combine |TUs with -combine
Target Milestone|4.1.3 |4.2.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23104
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug c/23104] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] C does not reject the same function in two different TUs with -combine
[not found] <bug-23104-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-04 19:59 ` [Bug c/23104] [4.2/4.3/4.4 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-14 17:10 ` nightstrike at gmail dot com
2009-03-31 18:53 ` [Bug c/23104] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: nightstrike at gmail dot com @ 2008-07-14 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from nightstrike at gmail dot com 2008-07-14 17:09 -------
On 4.2.4 and 4.3.1, I get this:
$ cat > a.c
int f(void) {}
$ cat > b.c
int f(void) {}
$ /opt/cfarm/release/4.3.1/bin/gcc -combine a.c b.c
a.c:2: error: redefinition of 'f'
a.c:1: error: previous definition of 'f' was here
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23104
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug c/23104] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] C does not reject the same function in two different TUs with -combine
[not found] <bug-23104-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-14 17:10 ` nightstrike at gmail dot com
@ 2009-03-31 18:53 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-04 12:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-03-31 18:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-31 18:52 -------
Closing 4.2 branch.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.2/4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression]|[4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] C
|C does not reject the same |does not reject the same
|function in two different |function in two different
|TUs with -combine |TUs with -combine
Target Milestone|4.2.5 |4.3.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23104
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug c/23104] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] C does not reject the same function in two different TUs with -combine
[not found] <bug-23104-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2009-03-31 18:53 ` [Bug c/23104] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-04 12:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-22 18:15 ` [Bug c/23104] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-04 12:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:26 -------
GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23104
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug c/23104] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] C does not reject the same function in two different TUs with -combine
[not found] <bug-23104-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-04 12:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-05-22 18:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-24 21:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-22 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:10 -------
GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23104
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug c/23104] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] C does not reject the same function in two different TUs with -combine
[not found] <bug-23104-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2010-05-22 18:15 ` [Bug c/23104] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-24 21:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-24 21:22 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-17 9:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-24 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #16 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-24 21:05 -------
No longer going to work on this one.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
|org |dot org
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23104
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug c/23104] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] C does not reject the same function in two different TUs with -combine
[not found] <bug-23104-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-24 21:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-24 21:22 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-17 9:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-24 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #17 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-24 21:22 -------
IMA (-combine) => WONTFIX?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23104
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug c/23104] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] C does not reject the same function in two different TUs with -combine
[not found] <bug-23104-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-24 21:22 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-09-17 9:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-09-17 9:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #18 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-17 09:06 -------
-combine has been removed from GCC 4.6 in favor of LTO, closing as WONTFIX.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23104
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread