From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23660 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2007 14:35:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 23621 invoked by uid 48); 17 Feb 2007 14:35:38 -0000 Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 14:35:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070217143538.23620.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/30826] alignment error when optimizing with inlining In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "michael dot haubenwallner at salomon dot at" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-02/txt/msg02051.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #6 from michael dot haubenwallner at salomon dot at 2007-02-17 14:35 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > There is another bug (PR15087) about GCC not obeying the IA64 runtime alignment > requrements in other cases. > Huh, this one is nearly three years old. After reading that one, if understanding right, I'd be happy to have a patch for gcc to fix this if available, even if not in svn, as we link only against oracle and SAP libs from third party, not using structures as return values IIRC. Everything else is built with this same gcc. Or would it be enough to simply disable inlining here as a workaround ? If yes, a simple patch to disable inlining for this platform might help, to avoid to have our build-process always pass -fno-inline (unfortunately we're not using autotools everywhere yet). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30826