From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27759 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2007 21:24:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 27739 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2007 21:24:34 -0000 Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 21:24:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070217212434.27738.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug bootstrap/30832] [regression] --with-sysroot=foobar wrong handled In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "drow at false dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-02/txt/msg02086.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #6 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-17 21:24 ------- Subject: Re: [regression] --with-sysroot=foobar wrong handled On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 12:23:51PM -0000, mtrudel at gmx dot ch wrote: > However, I really think this should not be required since it worked with gcc > 4.2 and everything else is the same. So either it was a catastrophic build > error on 4.2 and miracle that the compiled gcc worked (without linux/limits.h) > or it's a regression now. Sounds more like the former. 4.2 may have been using your system's headers in this case. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30832