public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/30681]  New: "obsolescent" vs. "obsolete"
@ 2007-02-02 15:27 vivekrao4 at yahoo dot com
  2007-02-05 14:05 ` [Bug fortran/30681] " vivekrao4 at yahoo dot com
                   ` (9 more replies)
  0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: vivekrao4 at yahoo dot com @ 2007-02-02 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1631 bytes --]

For a code with an arithmetic IF, for example

program xx
implicit none
integer :: i
i = 0
if (i) 10,20,30
10 print*,"negative"
stop
20 print*,"zero"
stop
30 print*,"positive"
stop
end program xx

mingw gfortran 4.3.0 20061021 says

 In file xarithmetic_if.f90:5

if (i) 10,20,30
              1
Warning: Obsolete: arithmetic IF statement at (1)

According to the Fortran 95 Handbook the arithmetic IF is "obsolescent", not
"obsolete".

The Fortran 2003 standard lists the following features as "obsolescent" in
section B.2, "Obsolescent features".

5 (1) Arithmetic IF — use the IF statement (8.1.2.4) or IF construct (8.1.2).
6 (2) Shared DO termination and termination on a statement other than END DO or
CON7
TINUE — use an END DO or a CONTINUE statement for each DO statement.
8 (3) Alternate return — see B.2.1.
9 (4) Computed GO TO statement — see B.2.2.
10 (5) Statement functions — see B.2.3.
11 (6) DATA statements amongst executable statements — see B.2.4.
12 (7) Assumed length character functions — see B.2.5.
13 (8) Fixed form source — see B.2.6.
14 (9) CHARACTER* form of CHARACTER declaration — see B.2.7.

Gfortran should use the term "obsolescent" rather than "obsolete" for all of
these features. I have only looked at arithmetic IF.


-- 
           Summary: "obsolescent" vs. "obsolete"
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.3.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: vivekrao4 at yahoo dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30681


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-02-23 18:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-02-02 15:27 [Bug fortran/30681] New: "obsolescent" vs. "obsolete" vivekrao4 at yahoo dot com
2007-02-05 14:05 ` [Bug fortran/30681] " vivekrao4 at yahoo dot com
2007-02-05 16:25 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-07  2:11 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-07  4:31 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2007-02-19  6:30 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2007-02-19  6:48 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-19  6:52 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-23 18:17 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-23 18:20 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-23 18:37 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).