public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/30888] New: %VAL construct fails with argument procedures
@ 2007-02-20 17:40 p dot w dot draper at durham dot ac dot uk
2007-02-20 19:54 ` [Bug fortran/30888] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: p dot w dot draper at durham dot ac dot uk @ 2007-02-20 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
When calling procedures which are passed as arguments to
a subroutine the %VAL construct has inconsistent behaviour.
Consider the following code:
SUBROUTINE VALTEST( DOIT )
EXTERNAL DOIT
INTEGER P
INTEGER I
I = 0
P = 0
CALL DOIT( %VAL( P ) )
CALL DOIT( I )
CALL DOIT( %VAL( P ) )
END
> gfortran -c valtest.f
valtest.f:9.22:
CALL DOIT( %VAL( P ) )
1
Error: By-value argument at (1) is not allowed in this context
which is an error caused by the second identical call to DOIT(%VAL(P)).
--
Summary: %VAL construct fails with argument procedures
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: p dot w dot draper at durham dot ac dot uk
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30888
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/30888] %VAL construct fails with argument procedures 2007-02-20 17:40 [Bug fortran/30888] New: %VAL construct fails with argument procedures p dot w dot draper at durham dot ac dot uk @ 2007-02-20 19:54 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-23 16:19 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-02-20 19:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-20 19:54 ------- Confirmed. It fails in resolve.c's resolve_actual_arglist /* Intrinsics are still PROC_UNKNOWN here. However, since same file external procedures are not resolvable in gfortran, it is a good deal easier to leave them to intrinsic.c. */ if (ptype != PROC_UNKNOWN && ptype != PROC_EXTERNAL) { gfc_error ("By-value argument at %L is not allowed " "in this context", &e->where); return FAILURE; } -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu dot | |org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Keywords| |rejects-valid Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-02-20 19:54:34 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30888 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/30888] %VAL construct fails with argument procedures 2007-02-20 17:40 [Bug fortran/30888] New: %VAL construct fails with argument procedures p dot w dot draper at durham dot ac dot uk 2007-02-20 19:54 ` [Bug fortran/30888] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-02-23 16:19 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-28 18:18 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-28 18:27 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-02-23 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-23 16:18 ------- As the :ADDPATCH: mechanism didn't work: A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/msg01839.html -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |burnus at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2007-02-20 19:54:34 |2007-02-23 16:18:51 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30888 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/30888] %VAL construct fails with argument procedures 2007-02-20 17:40 [Bug fortran/30888] New: %VAL construct fails with argument procedures p dot w dot draper at durham dot ac dot uk 2007-02-20 19:54 ` [Bug fortran/30888] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-23 16:19 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-02-28 18:18 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-28 18:27 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-02-28 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-28 18:17 ------- Subject: Bug 30888 Author: burnus Date: Wed Feb 28 18:17:34 2007 New Revision: 122409 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=122409 Log: 2007-02-28 Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de> Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org> PR fortran/30888 PR fortran/30887 * resolve.c (resolve_actual_arglist): Allow by-value arguments and non-default-kind for %VAL(). * trans-expr.c (conv_arglist_function): Allow non-default-kind for %VAL(). testsuite/ 2007-02-28 Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de> Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org> PR fortran/30888 PR fortran/30887 * c_by_val_1.f: Test %VAL() with non-default kind. * c_by_val.c: Ditto. * c_by_val_4.f: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/c_by_val_4.f Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/c_by_val.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/c_by_val_1.f -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30888 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/30888] %VAL construct fails with argument procedures 2007-02-20 17:40 [Bug fortran/30888] New: %VAL construct fails with argument procedures p dot w dot draper at durham dot ac dot uk ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2007-02-28 18:18 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-02-28 18:27 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-02-28 18:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-28 18:26 ------- Fixed in GCC 4.3, not part of 4.2 => close PR. Thanks for having reported this bug. -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30888 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-02-28 18:27 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2007-02-20 17:40 [Bug fortran/30888] New: %VAL construct fails with argument procedures p dot w dot draper at durham dot ac dot uk 2007-02-20 19:54 ` [Bug fortran/30888] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-23 16:19 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-28 18:18 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-28 18:27 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).