From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26902 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2007 22:41:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 26823 invoked by uid 48); 20 Feb 2007 22:41:10 -0000 Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:41:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070220224110.26822.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/30883] procedure with dummy procedure f1 rejected with implicit none In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-02/txt/msg02405.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-20 22:41 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > Has this been checked against comp.lang.fortran? > Steven, I haven't located the relevant text, but I believe that Joost is right. The INTERFACE defines it own scoping unit, and the IMPLICIT NONE does propagate into it via host association. -- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30883