public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "baldrick at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/30911] VRP fails to eliminate range checks in Ada code
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 22:54:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070222225427.29066.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-30911-13647@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
------- Comment #11 from baldrick at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-22 22:54 -------
> Please do not overwrite changes, thanks.
Sorry about that - it wasn't on purpose: your comment
and mine collided. I actually checked the two bugs
after getting the message that I'd manage to wipe out
your change, and the relationship between 26797 and
30911 that you'd set up still seemed to be there.
So I guess bugzilla is too subtle for me...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30911
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-22 22:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-21 13:57 [Bug tree-optimization/30911] New: " baldrick at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-21 15:18 ` [Bug tree-optimization/30911] " baldrick at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-21 17:55 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-21 18:01 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-22 17:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-22 17:33 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-22 17:41 ` baldrick at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-22 18:01 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-22 18:14 ` baldrick at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-22 18:18 ` baldrick at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-22 18:19 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-22 22:54 ` baldrick at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2007-02-23 5:50 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-23 9:22 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-23 9:39 ` baldrick at free dot fr
2007-02-23 10:03 ` baldrick at free dot fr
2007-02-23 11:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-23 11:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-23 12:36 ` baldrick at free dot fr
2007-02-23 12:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-23 13:05 ` baldrick at free dot fr
2007-02-23 14:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-23 15:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-23 15:40 ` baldrick at free dot fr
2007-02-23 15:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-23 15:59 ` baldrick at free dot fr
2007-02-23 16:01 ` baldrick at free dot fr
2007-02-23 16:05 ` charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-23 16:11 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-23 17:09 ` baldrick at free dot fr
2007-02-23 17:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-23 20:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-23 22:40 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-24 10:12 ` Arnaud Charlet
2007-02-24 12:32 ` Arnaud Charlet
2007-02-24 10:12 ` charlet at adacore dot com
2007-02-24 12:32 ` charlet at adacore dot com
2007-02-24 12:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-02-24 12:47 ` Arnaud Charlet
2007-02-24 12:48 ` charlet at adacore dot com
2007-02-28 23:30 ` baldrick at free dot fr
2007-03-01 8:18 ` baldrick at free dot fr
2007-03-01 9:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-01 23:07 ` baldrick at free dot fr
2007-03-02 9:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-02 9:16 ` baldrick at free dot fr
2007-03-02 9:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-28 12:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-28 14:59 ` baldrick at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-28 19:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-28 22:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-28 22:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-28 22:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-28 22:43 ` baldrick at free dot fr
2008-03-28 22:49 ` baldrick at free dot fr
2008-03-28 22:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-30 9:15 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-30 14:15 ` baldrick at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-30 14:19 ` baldrick at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-30 14:27 ` baldrick at free dot fr
2008-03-30 14:53 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2008-03-30 14:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-30 15:03 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-30 15:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-30 15:17 ` baldrick at free dot fr
2008-03-30 15:46 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-30 15:56 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2008-03-30 16:03 ` baldrick at free dot fr
2008-03-30 16:16 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-30 16:19 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-30 17:04 ` baldrick at free dot fr
2008-04-03 19:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-17 11:04 ` baldrick at free dot fr
2009-11-17 11:19 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-11-17 15:08 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2009-11-17 15:50 ` Arnaud Charlet
2009-11-17 15:50 ` charlet at adacore dot com
2009-11-17 16:57 ` baldrick at free dot fr
2009-11-17 17:03 ` charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070222225427.29066.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).