public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/29983]  New: [Regression 4.2] Out of range offset for ldrd/strd intruction.
@ 2006-11-26  3:27 raj dot khem at gmail dot com
  2006-11-26  3:28 ` [Bug target/29983] " raj dot khem at gmail dot com
                   ` (7 more replies)
  0 siblings, 8 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: raj dot khem at gmail dot com @ 2006-11-26  3:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

GCC 4.2 is generating wrong offset while compiling the attached example. This
only happens when using -mcpu=iwmmxt option. It works ok on 3.4.6

/tmp/cc4oD6OO.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/cc4oD6OO.s:15151: Error: bad immediate value for half-word offset (328)
/tmp/cc4oD6OO.s:15151: Error: bad immediate value for half-word offset (512)
/tmp/cc4oD6OO.s:15151: Error: bad immediate value for half-word offset (328)
/tmp/cc4oD6OO.s:15151: Error: bad immediate value for half-word offset (328)

To reproduce this compile the testcase with gcc -O2 -c -mcpu=iwmmxt


-- 
           Summary: [Regression 4.2] Out of range offset for ldrd/strd
                    intruction.
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.2.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: raj dot khem at gmail dot com
 GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: armv5tel-*-linux-gnueabi


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29983


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/29983] [Regression 4.2] Out of range offset for ldrd/strd intruction.
  2006-11-26  3:27 [Bug target/29983] New: [Regression 4.2] Out of range offset for ldrd/strd intruction raj dot khem at gmail dot com
@ 2006-11-26  3:28 ` raj dot khem at gmail dot com
  2006-11-26  3:50 ` [Bug target/29983] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: raj dot khem at gmail dot com @ 2006-11-26  3:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from raj dot khem at gmail dot com  2006-11-26 03:27 -------
Created an attachment (id=12693)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12693&action=view)
testcase


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29983


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/29983] Out of range offset for ldrd/strd intruction.
  2006-11-26  3:27 [Bug target/29983] New: [Regression 4.2] Out of range offset for ldrd/strd intruction raj dot khem at gmail dot com
  2006-11-26  3:28 ` [Bug target/29983] " raj dot khem at gmail dot com
@ 2006-11-26  3:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-11-26  4:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-11-26  3:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-11-26 03:50 -------
eabi was not added until at least 4.0.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Known to work|3.4.6                       |
            Summary|[Regression 4.2] Out of     |Out of range offset for
                   |range offset for ldrd/strd  |ldrd/strd intruction.
                   |intruction.                 |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29983


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/29983] Out of range offset for ldrd/strd intruction.
  2006-11-26  3:27 [Bug target/29983] New: [Regression 4.2] Out of range offset for ldrd/strd intruction raj dot khem at gmail dot com
  2006-11-26  3:28 ` [Bug target/29983] " raj dot khem at gmail dot com
  2006-11-26  3:50 ` [Bug target/29983] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-11-26  4:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-11-26  4:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-11-26  4:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-11-26 04:04 -------
Hmm, with that target I get:
checking target system type... Invalid configuration `armv5tel-linux-gnueabi':
machine `armv5tel' not recognized


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29983


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/29983] Out of range offset for ldrd/strd intruction.
  2006-11-26  3:27 [Bug target/29983] New: [Regression 4.2] Out of range offset for ldrd/strd intruction raj dot khem at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-11-26  4:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-11-26  4:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-11-26  7:06 ` raj dot khem at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-11-26  4:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-11-26 04:36 -------
I see:
        ldrd    r2, [r1], #328


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29983


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/29983] Out of range offset for ldrd/strd intruction.
  2006-11-26  3:27 [Bug target/29983] New: [Regression 4.2] Out of range offset for ldrd/strd intruction raj dot khem at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-11-26  4:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-11-26  7:06 ` raj dot khem at gmail dot com
  2007-01-09 11:10 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: raj dot khem at gmail dot com @ 2006-11-26  7:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #5 from raj dot khem at gmail dot com  2006-11-26 07:05 -------
It is also reproducible using trunk and arm-none-eabi


-- 

raj dot khem at gmail dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 GCC target triplet|armv5tel-*-linux-gnueabi    |arm-none-eabi
      Known to fail|4.2.0                       |4.2.0 4.3.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29983


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/29983] Out of range offset for ldrd/strd intruction.
  2006-11-26  3:27 [Bug target/29983] New: [Regression 4.2] Out of range offset for ldrd/strd intruction raj dot khem at gmail dot com
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-11-26  7:06 ` raj dot khem at gmail dot com
@ 2007-01-09 11:10 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-01-09 17:01 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-03-02 22:51 ` pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-01-09 11:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #6 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-01-09 11:10 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> I see:
>         ldrd    r2, [r1], #328
> 

Which isn't a valid instruction (the offset is too large).


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29983


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/29983] Out of range offset for ldrd/strd intruction.
  2006-11-26  3:27 [Bug target/29983] New: [Regression 4.2] Out of range offset for ldrd/strd intruction raj dot khem at gmail dot com
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-01-09 11:10 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-01-09 17:01 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-03-02 22:51 ` pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-01-09 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #7 from rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-01-09 17:01 -------
Confirmed.  This is iwmmxt-specific and occurs because the co-processor
load-double-word instructions have a larger offset than LDRD.


-- 

rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2007-01-09 17:01:12
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29983


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/29983] Out of range offset for ldrd/strd intruction.
  2006-11-26  3:27 [Bug target/29983] New: [Regression 4.2] Out of range offset for ldrd/strd intruction raj dot khem at gmail dot com
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-01-09 17:01 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-03-02 22:51 ` pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-03-02 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #8 from pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-03-02 22:51 -------
Fixed.
trunk r122437 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2007-03/msg00020.html
4.2 r122489 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2007-03/msg00072.html


-- 

pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29983


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-03-02 22:51 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-11-26  3:27 [Bug target/29983] New: [Regression 4.2] Out of range offset for ldrd/strd intruction raj dot khem at gmail dot com
2006-11-26  3:28 ` [Bug target/29983] " raj dot khem at gmail dot com
2006-11-26  3:50 ` [Bug target/29983] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-11-26  4:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-11-26  4:37 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-11-26  7:06 ` raj dot khem at gmail dot com
2007-01-09 11:10 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-01-09 17:01 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-02 22:51 ` pbrook at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).