public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ada/26797] [4.3 regression] ACATS cxh1001 fails Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 11:11:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20070309111135.7764.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-26797-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #30 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-09 11:11 ------- Well, the only problem with V_C_E is that if you assert on the range of the base type like if (V_C_E <X'Base> (y) > 5) abort(); that you still want VRP to infer that V_C_E <X'Base> (y) is <= 5 after this check (to eliminate further checks). I believe this will not automatically happen at the moment because V_C_E <X'Base> (y) will not have the same ssa name assigned for evey occurance. But of course we will never know until the Ada FE people finally fix their frontend. All the mess would be way easier if the FE would not expose the subtypes to the middle-end... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26797
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-09 11:11 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2006-03-22 7:29 [Bug ada/26797] New: [4.2 Regression] ACATS c35507m cd2a23e cxh1001 wrong code laurent at guerby dot net 2006-03-22 10:33 ` [Bug ada/26797] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-22 18:48 ` [Bug ada/26797] [4.2 Regression] ACATS c35507m cd2a23e cxh1001 failures ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-22 21:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-23 13:19 ` [Bug tree-optimization/26797] " baldrick at free dot fr 2006-03-27 17:09 ` law at redhat dot com 2006-03-27 17:23 ` law at redhat dot com 2006-03-27 20:12 ` laurent at guerby dot net 2006-03-27 20:31 ` law at redhat dot com 2006-03-28 3:56 ` kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu 2006-03-28 15:01 ` law at redhat dot com 2006-03-28 15:33 ` law at redhat dot com 2006-03-30 7:58 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-30 8:25 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-30 8:32 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-30 12:13 ` kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu 2006-04-21 23:40 ` [Bug tree-optimization/26797] [4.2 Regression] ACATS c35507m cd2a23e cxh1001 fail pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-21 23:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-21 23:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-04 8:27 ` christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2006-06-04 18:19 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-26 23:41 ` laurent at guerby dot net 2006-06-27 3:05 ` kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu 2006-10-29 23:17 ` [Bug ada/26797] [4.2/4.3 regression] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-30 9:04 ` law at redhat dot com 2006-10-30 9:21 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-04 10:06 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-04 10:08 ` [Bug ada/26797] [4.3 regression] ACATS " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-08 9:57 ` [Bug ada/26797] [4.3 regression] ACATS cxh1001 fails baldrick at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-08 12:54 ` kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu 2007-03-08 16:06 ` baldrick at free dot fr 2007-03-08 16:52 ` kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu 2007-03-09 10:41 ` baldrick at free dot fr 2007-03-09 11:11 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message] 2007-03-09 11:19 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-09 11:35 ` baldrick at free dot fr 2007-03-09 11:50 ` baldrick at free dot fr 2007-03-09 13:59 ` kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu 2007-03-09 14:19 ` kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu 2007-03-09 14:29 ` kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu 2007-03-09 22:44 ` baldrick at free dot fr 2007-03-09 23:10 ` baldrick at free dot fr 2007-03-09 23:13 ` kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu 2007-03-09 23:41 ` baldrick at free dot fr 2007-03-10 0:17 ` kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu 2007-03-10 16:52 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-13 10:30 ` baldrick at free dot fr 2007-03-13 12:34 ` kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu 2007-09-12 15:53 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-12 15:55 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-15 6:35 ` law at redhat dot com
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20070309111135.7764.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).