public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/31067] MINLOC should sometimes be inlined (gas_dyn is sooooo sloooow)
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 19:43:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070311194323.10089.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-31067-10259@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #9 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-03-11 19:43 -------
I have looked at this some more.  Channging gfc_conv_intrinsic_function so that
we call gfc_conv_intrinsic_minmaxloc is easy enough:

@@ -3481,7 +3481,9 @@ gfc_conv_intrinsic_function (gfc_se * se

   name = &expr->value.function.name[2];

-  if (expr->rank > 0 && !expr->inline_noncopying_intrinsic)
+  if (expr->rank > 0 && !expr->inline_noncopying_intrinsic
+      && ! (expr->rank == 1 && (isym->generic_id ==  GFC_ISYM_MINLOC
+                               || isym->generic_id == GFC_ISYM_MAXLOC)))
     {
       lib = gfc_is_intrinsic_libcall (expr);
       if (lib != 0)

If we do that, we hit the  "if (se->ss)" contition on top of that function, and
we would have to handle scalarization of that one-trip loop.  I have currently
no idea how to go about that.  Simply removing the condition doesn't work :-)

As a workaround, one could always use "minloc(...,dim=1)", then
we get the inline version.

Unassigning myself.


-- 

tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot  |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
                   |org                         |dot org
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEW


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31067


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-03-11 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-07 10:20 [Bug fortran/31067] New: " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-07 11:28 ` [Bug fortran/31067] " tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-07 12:18 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-07 21:00 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-07 21:09 ` fxcoudert at gmail dot com
2007-03-07 21:10 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-07 21:29 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-08  5:50 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-10 12:34 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-11 19:43 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2007-03-12 19:04 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-13 20:12 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-26 10:38 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-26 11:44 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-02 16:44 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-02 20:01 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-05-18 20:16 ` jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-05-18 20:20 ` jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-15 20:35 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-27 14:49 ` jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-02 21:03 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-01-02 21:07 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2009-07-03 10:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-03 12:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-03 12:41 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-03 12:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-03 13:07 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-05  6:48 ` irar at il dot ibm dot com
2009-07-20 12:04 ` irar at il dot ibm dot com
2009-07-24  7:57 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-24  8:20 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-24  8:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-26  7:48 ` irar at il dot ibm dot com
2009-07-26  9:50 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-27  8:36 ` irar at il dot ibm dot com
2009-07-27  9:18 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-27 11:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-27 11:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-27 12:44 ` irar at il dot ibm dot com
2009-07-27 13:15 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-27 14:51 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-28  8:12 ` irar at il dot ibm dot com
     [not found] <bug-31067-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-07-25 15:44 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-28 13:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-28 16:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-28 20:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-29  7:13 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070311194323.10089.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).