public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug objc++/31134] [4.3 Regression] Objective-C++ has ran into the tree number limit Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 05:05:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20070312050504.4374.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-31134-276@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-12 05:05 ------- Even though Objective-C++ is not a release blocker, it would be nice for all of the C++ patches to test with objective-C++ on and really that should be a requirement. I rather see Objective-C++ working than C++0x. The features that C++0x give are not as good as the features give by Objective-C++ in my mind. Though the objective-C++ can reduce the number of tree codes it uses, the number will only be by like 2-3. Objective-C++ uses only 10 extra tree codes about C++ so really C++ is going to hit the limit soon if we are not careful anyways. Also adding new features should not break old features so Doug in my mind you should revert your patch in 48 hours if you cannot fix it by then, I requesting this as the GNU libobjc maintainer. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |blocker http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31134
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-12 5:05 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2007-03-11 14:40 [Bug objc++/31134] New: objc-act.c:570: error: comparison is always false danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-11 14:42 ` [Bug objc++/31134] " danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-11 15:03 ` schwab at suse dot de 2007-03-11 22:53 ` [Bug objc++/31134] [4.3 Regression] Objective-C++ has ran into the tree number limit dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-03-11 23:48 ` pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-03-12 0:56 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-03-12 1:04 ` pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-03-12 5:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message] 2007-03-12 9:08 ` pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-03-28 18:46 ` dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20070312050504.4374.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).