public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/31157]  New: Bitfield is not promoted
@ 2007-03-12 23:02 ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
  2007-03-12 23:03 ` [Bug c++/31157] " ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
  2007-03-13 10:26 ` [Bug c++/31157] [4.2/4.3 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: ismail at pardus dot org dot tr @ 2007-03-12 23:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

Following testcase compiles fine with gcc 3.4.6 but not with gcc 4.2.0 20070307
:

----- cut here -----
#include <iostream>

using namespace std;

class Foo
{
    public:
        Foo() { x=1; y=0; };
        unsigned int x:12;
        unsigned int y;
};

int main()
{
  Foo bar;

  max(bar.y,bar.x);

  return 0;
}
----- cut here -----

The error is :

max.cpp: In function 'int main()':
max.cpp:17: error: no matching function for call to 'max(unsigned int&, short
unsigned int:12&)'


-- 
           Summary: Bitfield is not promoted
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.2.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: ismail at pardus dot org dot tr


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31157


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/31157] Bitfield is not promoted
  2007-03-12 23:02 [Bug c++/31157] New: Bitfield is not promoted ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
@ 2007-03-12 23:03 ` ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
  2007-03-13 10:26 ` [Bug c++/31157] [4.2/4.3 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: ismail at pardus dot org dot tr @ 2007-03-12 23:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from ismail at pardus dot org dot tr  2007-03-12 23:03 -------
Original code was from WebKit SVN.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31157


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/31157] [4.2/4.3 Regression] Bitfield is not promoted
  2007-03-12 23:02 [Bug c++/31157] New: Bitfield is not promoted ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
  2007-03-12 23:03 ` [Bug c++/31157] " ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
@ 2007-03-13 10:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-03-13 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-03-13 10:26 -------
This has been fixed on the branch by the patch for PR30274.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |30274
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
           Keywords|                            |rejects-valid
      Known to work|                            |4.1.2
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
            Summary|Bitfield is not promoted    |[4.2/4.3 Regression]
                   |                            |Bitfield is not promoted
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.2.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31157


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-03-13 10:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-03-12 23:02 [Bug c++/31157] New: Bitfield is not promoted ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
2007-03-12 23:03 ` [Bug c++/31157] " ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
2007-03-13 10:26 ` [Bug c++/31157] [4.2/4.3 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).