From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11074 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2007 19:45:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 10941 invoked by uid 48); 15 Mar 2007 19:45:10 -0000 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:45:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070315194510.10940.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/30927] tree-nested creates pointless static chains and trampolines when the callgraph is non-trivial In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "baldrick at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-03/txt/msg01432.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #6 from baldrick at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-15 19:45 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Try this: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-03/msg01201.html I don't think you need to consider FDESC_EXPR when constructing the callgraph. It seems only to be used for vtables; and since none of the rest of tree-nested checks for it, I guess either the rest of tree-nested is wrong or it's not needed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30927