From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15991 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2007 04:09:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 15954 invoked by alias); 16 Mar 2007 04:09:05 -0000 Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 04:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070316040905.15953.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/29471] Warn with -std=f95/f2003 when BOZ is used at invalid places In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-03/txt/msg01473.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #8 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2007-03-16 04:09 ------- Subject: Re: Warn with -std=f95/f2003 when BOZ is used at invalid places On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 03:53:57AM -0000, jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com wrote: > > I have not checked F2008 yet. My vote is to just ignore the standards when it > comes to negative BOZ, the way Intel has done it, which I HOPE is what F2008 > says. gfortran doesn't have that luxury. it can't ignore the standard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29471