From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7890 invoked by alias); 17 Mar 2007 20:48:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 7862 invoked by uid 48); 17 Mar 2007 20:48:24 -0000 Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 20:48:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070317204824.7861.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/31246] Strange -Wunreachable-code warning with _GLIBCXX_DEBUG In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pcarlini at suse dot de" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-03/txt/msg01690.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #6 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-03-17 20:48 ------- And I'm recategorizing as C++: either (as I strongly believe) a very general diagnostic issue, or maybe a duplicate of C++/30500: certainly there is nothing we can do on the library side to "fix" the implementation of placement new itself (per Chris' comment #4. By the way, in that specific case I think we are missing the pragma from the header, because there are no templates involved and should work. But that's not the point). -- pcarlini at suse dot de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|libstdc++ |c++ http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31246