From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17165 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2007 22:59:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 17131 invoked by uid 48); 19 Mar 2007 22:59:25 -0000 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 22:59:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070319225925.17130.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libfortran/31052] Bad IOSTAT values when readings NAMELISTs past EOF In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "anlauf at gmx dot de" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-03/txt/msg01869.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #20 from anlauf at gmx dot de 2007-03-19 22:59 ------- (In reply to comment #19) Jerry, I tried FX's snapshot from today (20070319) and the example above works. A somewhat more twisted example which I have not yet been able to reduce leads to an IOSTAT value of 5001 (BTW: what does that value mean?) in the namelist read, although the subroutine position_nml succeeds. The file libgfortran is not in that distribution. Could you please put here these IOSTAT values? Nor are these in the .info files. Thanks! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31052