From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5510 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2007 14:58:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 5469 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2007 14:57:52 -0000 Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:58:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070320145752.5468.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/31249] pseudo-optimzation with sincos/cexpi In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-03/txt/msg01932.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #11 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-03-20 14:57 ------- Subject: Re: pseudo-optimzation with sincos/cexpi > That sin+cos is practically sincos (so you get one for free). Just not every > library exports that sincos. Does not this assume that it exists a real sincos(x) and not a faked one thorugh cexp((1,x))? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31249