From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19912 invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2007 14:50:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 19867 invoked by uid 48); 21 Mar 2007 14:50:20 -0000 Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070321145020.19866.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/30877] Extending intrinsic operators In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-03/txt/msg02039.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-21 14:50 ------- Created an attachment (id=13243) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13243&action=view) Patch to fix the problem reported This one is mine. Attached patch (regtested on i686-linux) fixes the failure and, as far as I see, should bring the extension of intrinsic operators completely in line with the standards. I still need to come up with a complete testcase to ensure that I haven't forgotten something along the way. -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30877