From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29362 invoked by alias); 23 Mar 2007 15:00:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 29128 invoked by uid 48); 23 Mar 2007 15:00:01 -0000 Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:00:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070323150001.29127.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/19351] operator new[] can return heap blocks which are too small In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-03/txt/msg02231.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-23 15:00 ------- What does the C standard say about calloc? That's a similar case; the multiplication is in calloc. Does it have to report an error? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19351