public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jvdelisle at verizon dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libfortran/31052] Bad IOSTAT values when readings NAMELISTs past EOF
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 19:02:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070324190237.18880.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-31052-6318@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #30 from jvdelisle at verizon dot net  2007-03-24 19:02 -------
Subject: Re:  Bad IOSTAT values when readings NAMELISTs
 past EOF

I will keep at it on this.  It seems we have a conflict between the SPEC 
test that was failing and the namelist testcases.  Unfortunately I don't 
have the SPEC test case to see to try to weed this out.

What I will do is work on the patch i had before and send it to folks to 
  test the SPEC portion.  That may take a while, so please be patient.

Sorry for the troubles.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31052


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-03-24 19:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-05 22:24 [Bug libfortran/31052] New: " anlauf at gmx dot de
2007-03-05 22:26 ` [Bug libfortran/31052] " anlauf at gmx dot de
2007-03-05 23:27 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-06  8:20 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2007-03-06  8:42 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2007-03-06 10:22 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2007-03-06 15:53 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2007-03-06 21:51 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2007-03-06 21:52 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2007-03-06 22:00 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2007-03-07  3:37 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-07  3:38 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-07  4:46 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-07  6:41 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-08  5:52 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-08  8:24 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2007-03-09  7:37 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-14  3:45 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2007-03-18 18:14 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-18 18:17 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-19 22:59 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2007-03-20  1:47 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2007-03-20  2:20 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-20  8:51 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2007-03-22 13:54 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2007-03-22 20:38 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-23  0:13 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-23 22:39 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2007-03-23 22:40 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2007-03-23 22:43 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2007-03-24 19:02 ` jvdelisle at verizon dot net [this message]
2007-03-26  6:01 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-26 12:15 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2007-03-26 15:54 ` spark at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-26 20:55 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-28  0:20 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-28  0:59 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-03-28 21:22 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2007-04-01 16:01 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2007-04-01 17:32 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-01 17:33 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-02  7:42 ` [Bug libfortran/31052] [4.2 only] " anlauf at gmx dot de
2007-04-02 13:35 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-10 20:40 ` anlauf at gmx dot de
2007-04-13  4:28 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2007-04-13  4:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-13  7:05   ` Jerry DeLisle
2007-04-13  7:05 ` jvdelisle at verizon dot net
2007-04-13 16:16 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2007-04-14 19:19 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-14 21:09 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2007-04-15  1:55 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-28  4:19 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-05-20 22:51 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-05-26  3:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070324190237.18880.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).