From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15038 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2007 17:24:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 14866 invoked by uid 48); 27 Mar 2007 17:24:43 -0000 Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:24:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070327172443.14865.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libstdc++/31368] basic_string and unsigned short leads to memory fault In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pcarlini at suse dot de" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-03/txt/msg02591.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #8 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-03-27 18:24 ------- (In reply to comment #7) > Unfortunately I do not have possibility to run my test case using latest GCC > compiler. I’m limited in hardware and software choice. Besides I’m not sure > what do you mean “to fix testcase”. As I said, the testcase Segfaults badly on any recent machine, for but also for and also for plain char. This is unfortunate, this is not the behavior you expected when you submitted the PR, and if we cannot reproduce the issue that you are maintaining to see we cannot understand it and we cannot take any further action. Can you please double check you are building the so, dlopening, etc, in your testcase in the correct, portable way? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31368