From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17479 invoked by alias); 31 Mar 2007 01:23:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 17304 invoked by uid 48); 31 Mar 2007 01:23:00 -0000 Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 01:23:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070331012300.17303.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug bootstrap/31235] Bootstrap comparison failure with -gstabs In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-03/txt/msg02819.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #2 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-31 02:23 ------- I was able to reproduce this on an x86_64-linux machine following the instructions. Assuming this is the same conceptual problem as 31230, I tried the same patch, in another file. Just marking the array type domain type as used so it wouldn't be garbage collected. It was a little harder here since we didn't have a convenient subroutine to call, so I had to move some code out of dbxout_type into a new function, but effectively there is only a one line actual code change here. This survived a C-only BOOT_CFLAGS=-gstabs bootstrap, which seems to be good evidence that it is working. This patch is otherwise untested. It needs a full bootstrap, gcc testsuite run, and gdb testsuite run. -- wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-03-31 02:23:00 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31235