From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5244 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2007 12:33:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 5164 invoked by uid 48); 17 Apr 2007 12:33:06 -0000 Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 12:33:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070417123306.5163.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/31587] Module files shouldn't be updated if their content doesn't change In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-04/txt/msg01215.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #10 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-17 13:33 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > The patch looks good, though it would probably be a better idea to use tmpnam() > to get the name for the temporary file. Why not. But I like the idea that it is predictable :) > A further thing one could do: instead of threatening "If you edit this, you'll > get what you deserve.\n\n", one could actually verify that the MD5 sum matches > the files contents. Too expensive! I'm against this additional cost (plus the developer cost of writing and maintaining it). About testcases, you mean for the dejagnu testsuite? I have really no idea... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31587